This page contains a Flash digital edition of a book.
Using a Complexity Factor to Calculate Cost Benefits of 3-D Sand Printing


A part complexity-based cost metric has been developed to analyze decisions


for economically viable implementation of 3-D sand printing. E. ALMAGHARIZ, B. CONNER, L. LENNER, R. GULLAPALLI, AND G. MANOGHARAN, YOUNGSTOWN STATE UNIVERSITY (YOUNGSTOWN, OHIO); B. LAMONCHA, HUMTOWN PRODUCTS (COLUMBIANA, OHIO); M. FANG, PURDUE UNIVERSITY (WEST LAFAYETTE, INDIANA)


T


hree-dimensional sand printing provides a means to fabricate molds and cores without the need to make


patterns and coreboxes. Metalcast- ers and end-users could benefit from learning more about when to use this evolving advanced technology over conventional patternmaking. To know more, researchers exam- ined the cost of molds and cores as a function of part design complexity quantified by a complexity factor. Two case studies illustrate how


the complexity of the castings is systematically varied by changing the geometry and number of cores. Tooling costs and fabrication costs are estimated for both 3-D sand printing and conventional patternmaking to calculate the break-even points for the two methods. Integral aspects of every sand cast- ing process involve tooling associated


with mold making. Tis includes the fabrication of patterns used to make the molds and the production of coreboxes to make cores. Some of the major limitations in moldmaking using traditional techniques include constraints such as limitations on minimum wall thickness, elimina- tion of sharp corners, and undercuts resulting in higher draft angles leading to increased fabrication costs. Tis is further amplified in the case of tooling for parts with higher complexity. For example, an expensive core and/ or set of cores are required for parts with complex internal geometry such as an engine block. In some cases, part design modification is required to facilitate pat- tern removal prior to pour during sand casting. Often this leads to nonfunctional part design modification and/or addi- tional processing steps after casting. Additive manufacturing in the


form of 3-D sand printing is comple-


Table 1. Geometric Attributes Used as Inputs for the Complexity Factor Model Part dimensions (length, width, height) Bounding box volume Part volume


Surface area of part Number of cores Volume of core


Thickness of part, min and max Draw depth


30 | MODERN CASTING April 2017


L, W, H Vb Vp Ap Nc


Vc, i Tmin Dd


and Tmax


mentary to the traditional approach of moldmaking in sand casting. 3-D sand printers can directly print a mold from computer-aided design (CAD) models of the desired part design in a matter of a few hours without the need for patterns or coreboxes. 3-D sand printing provides unique


advantages in moldmaking such as significantly reduced leadtime and flexibility without the need for tooling. It also offers additional geometric free- dom to produce complex designs not otherwise feasible or affordable using the traditional approach.


Tooling and Fabrication Cost Te sequential processing steps of


conventional sand casting are outlined in Figure 1. Downstream operations after fabrication of the corebox are independent of traditional and 3-D sand printing. Te primary scope of this study is associated with decision-making in the tooling of molds and cores and the fabrication of coreboxes prior to pouring. It is assumed part design complexity


will have minimal or no influence on the cost per casting in postfabrication operations including pour, shakeout and secondary operations such as heat treat- ment, machining and inspections. However, it should be noted


the consolidation of required cores (through 3-D sand printing) could substantially eliminate or mitigate flash that would generate additional finishing or inspection.


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60