This page contains a Flash digital edition of a book.
BY THE LAW


Know the Updates to Patent Law F


DAVE RESSER, WEGMAN, HESSLER & VANDERBURG (CLEVELAND)


rom time to time, foundries and foundry suppliers develop inven- tions for which they seek patent


protection. For metalcasters, this could include a new austempered ductile iron composition, a casting made from that composition, a method of making that composition, or a novel molding ma- chine. While these are a few examples, the limits of the invention are con- strained only by what the inventor can dream of. If you or your company apply for U.S. patents, this column will serve as a brief review of some considerations of U.S. law that have changed in the past few years. Te following law changes should be kept in mind prior to and dur- ing the patent application process. As of March 2013, the America


Invents Act (AIA) legislated some important changes to the patent law, and patent applicants need to be aware of these changes to more effectively apply for U.S. patents. Perhaps the most sig- nificant change from the AIA is the U.S. moved from a “first to invent” regime to a “first inventor to file” regime. Simply put, an applicant can no longer gain rights over a later applicant for the same inven- tion by proving that she invented the device first. Now, the inventor must be first to file, and this encourages inven- tors to file patent applications early in the process to help ensure that patent rights are main- tained over your competitors who may be working on similar inventions. “Prior art” is a


term that refers to


patent documents and other disclo- sures that can be used to defeat a pat- ent application. Te prior art available to a patent examiner during the patent examination process in the U.S. is defined by law. One challenge for pat- ent applicants is to identify applicable prior art and thus avoid overlooking


44 | MODERN CASTING June 2017


potentially fatal prior art. Te AIA changed fundamental assumptions defining what will and will not be con- sidered prior art under U.S. law. For example, public disclosures anywhere in the world in any language before your patent application filing date may be considered prior art. In other words, the new definitions remove geographic and language restrictions on prior art and will greatly expand in view of U.S. law what now may be considered prior art. Tis can add significant hurdles to an applicant because of the large amount of information available to us in many different languages. For exam- ple, patent applicants and even patent search experts may have difficulty find- ing and interpreting patent documents from the Far East that are written in symbolic character languages. Beneficially for patent applicants,


An earlier patent application filing


date protects against competitors filing


patent applications for similar or the same


inventions later.


commonly assigned patent applica- tions and subject matter developed under joint research agreements can be used to eliminate some prior art. Under the AIA rules, patents and in- ventions assigned to a single company can be disregarded as prior art if the invention described in a patent applica- tion is assigned to the same company. Te same is true for joint research agreements. In one example, if a U.S. patent examiner cites the patent of Company A as prior art against a later Company A patent applica- tion, that patent reference can be disregarded under


the principle of common assignment. Here are some suggestions that


may improve your or your metalcasting facility’s application process in light of the recent changes in U.S. patent law: • Develop company-wide employment agreements, employee handbooks and company policies that require


employees to promptly report inven- tions to the company. Te employ- ment agreements and employee handbooks should provide that in- ventions are automatically assigned to the company.


• Develop a company strategy to promptly review all employee inven- tions for commercial value. For those inventions determined to have value, promptly decide how to protect the invention (trade secret, patent or copyright). For inventions that the company decides to protect through patenting, develop a procedure to promptly file a patent application.


• Develop company forms and policies requiring visitors and other mem- bers of the public to sign non- disclosure agreements as a condition for entering company premises where an unprotected invention may be in use.


• Train employees on the importance of not using any invention in any setting that could be considered public until a patent application is filed for the invention.


• Train employees of the importance of not marketing or accepting orders for a product incorporating an invention until a patent application is filed for the invention.


• Train employees about the impor- tance of not disclosing an invention, either in writing or verbally, until a patent application is filed. Additionally, it is best practice to


not consider “disclosure” in the AIA as replacing a patent application filing; publishing is not a substitute for filing to obtain a strong patent position on the invention. An inventor or met- alcaster who has publicly disclosed an invention should file a patent applica- tion promptly or, better yet, before disclosure because a mere public disclosure will never provide an effec- tive filing date. In contrast, an earlier patent application filing date protects against competitors filing patent applications for similar or the same in- ventions later. Furthermore, disclosure before filing may be fatal with respect to international patent rights.


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60